Small Business Owners – Making Millions, of Jobs That Is…

Obama - Biden Entreprenever_edited-1President Obama, you coined the phrase “middle class economics” as one of your latest “camplaign” appeals.

I coined the phrase “Entreprenever” for you.

Mr. Obama, you have never been an entrepreneur.  You are successful beyond the imagination of most people’s dreams.  You are obviously a highly talented and intelligent person. You have a loving family.

You have a loyal and caring following… then here comes the but, at least not until, and unless, you are willing to walk in a small business owner’s shoes, you’re politics hurt small business owners.

I’m an entrepreneur.  I’m not a millionaire, but job growth is a constant in my business. There are a lot of small business entrepreneurs out there earning millions in taxable revenues for their small businesses, who aren’t millionaires.  They’re making jobs, not millions.  Why not millions of dollars? Too many regulations, too many taxes, too much big government getting in the way.

Small Business Owners make millions of jobs, not millions of dollars! That’s what I call “American Exceptionalism.”

Mr. President, if you truly want to help the middle class, help small businesses grow and hire more people.  They’re your middle class economy.  There are many up and coming millionaires that are making products, providing services and creating jobs.  They should be paying less taxes, NOT more, than they do today.

Small businesses want to invest their income in products, services and jobs, not squandered on meeting meaningless regulatory bureaucratic “make work.”  Call it unintended consequences, but I don’t think you really care, or you care more about bureaucratic jobs than you do about free enterprise jobs?  Free enterprise better defines “middle class economics” than big government any day!

Free enterprise defines middle class economics” better than big government any day!!

Small businesses that file their taxes as individuals need lower income tax rates, even at the top income brackets, so that we receive a fair return for the risk we take to grow our businesses.  In my case, growing a successful business from 1 to 40 FTEs required; cashing in all my savings, a second mortgage on the house, personal loans from friends and family, 12-14 hour days, no PTO or vacations for the first 10-12 years. The mortgage on my house was $100K when I bought the house.  Twenty-five years later after loans, it is still over $200K.  If I’m not successful, that will be my legacy to my children, not your children.

Before you insert your platitudes about every American giving their fair share, you’re too intelligent to believe our current entitlement society, including illegal immigrants choking our medical, educational and government resources, is fair to hard working legal US CITIZENS.

The failure rate for small businesses like my own is one success in five failures.  So where is your reward at the end of the tunnel?  Higher taxes.   You don’t care, but higher taxes on small business owners prevent further investment in their business,  reduces the chances of paying off outstanding loans and lost income due to lack of cash flow.

I didn’t have a 401K or savings account for over 10 years.  I don’t have a huge stock portfolio, a second home, fancy cars or take Alaskan cruises… well OK,  I did take an Alaskan cruise with my wife,  It was awesome!  Should I thank you Mr. President?  Higher taxes is how you, our President rewards hard work, ingenuity and innovation.  That’s why I coined the phrase for you, President Obama, Entreprenever.

Yes, I’ve seen the news stories about this small business and that small business, who obtained and SBA loan or some other government handout.  Good for them!  That’s great theater.  That’s great politics!  You’re the best!

I’m not going to get into the weeds on excessive regulation and the politics here.  There are plenty of people capable of doing so.  Of this I am certain.  You’ve never run a business, certainly not a small business, and certainly never had to put your life’s savings on the line for a small business.

Mr. Obama, you’re ticket’s already been punched.  You’ve already made millions.  You stand to make millions more.  Maybe you already have, so what’s my point?  My point is you can never say you are for the little guy, the small business owner, end of story.

For all the Rich and Famous liberals out there that make millions and billions, mind your own f$$$$n” business!! If you want to raise taxes on people, think about small business owners versus our government’s track record in making money.  You’re pretty good at it, why don’t you get it!!!

We’re $18 Trillion in debt.  You could let big government spend more money on the backs of hard-working small business people, as well as, their employees and their families.  You could push for lower taxes on small business owners or you could just put you money where your mouth is…

Send your contributions to:

Gifts to the United States
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Credit Accounting Branch
3700 East-West Highway, Room 622D
Hyattsville, MD 20782

Much obliged!

Sincerely,

The ideacapitalist

Small Business Owner

Costs are soaring for community banks struggling to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act and new regulations.

finregsCommunity banks are small business folks serving their fellow local small business community.  Dodd-Frank is just another example of what BIG can and will do to you.

Big Government regulating Big banks has consequences and don’t say they’re unintended as the mainstream media will have you believe.  We should make little Barney Frank and Chris Dodd go with the Feds next time they raid a small bank in a small tight knit community on a Friday night quittin’ time.

Make Dodd and Frank answer to small town bank employees faces when they lose their job.  Make them stay until the Feds are done.  In one case I know they made an IT Manager stay until midnight.  She was told to stand outside her cubicle while they rifled through her files and computer.  I wrote about this in The “Physical” Cliff, Writing Checks My Ass Can’t Cash.

Turns out regulating the BIG banks hurts community banks.

The State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas suspended its entire residential-mortgage division for fear of the newly “spawned” Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) liability.

Twelve hundred rural US counties would have “severely limited banking access” without community bankers, who also serve other key sectors of our economy:

Community banks provide 48.1 percent of small business loans issued by US banks, 15.7 percent of residential mortgage lending, 43.8 percent of farmland lending, 42.8 percent of farm lending, and 34.7 percent of commercial real estate loans, and they held 20 percent of all retail deposits at US banks as of 2010.

In the early crucial stages, when a small business needs a loan, the collateral must be equal to or greater than the loan value.  Most large banks just won’t bother.   So where do small businesses turn for essential short and long term cash flow needs?  

According to the National Federation Independent Business (NFIB), six percent of the owners reported that all their credit needs were not met, down 1 point and only 2 points above the record low. Thirty-one (31) percent of all owners reported borrowing on a regular basis.  A net 7% reported loans “harder to get” compared to their last attempt (asked of regular borrowers only), up 3 points.  The net percent of owners expecting credit conditions to ease in the coming months was a seasonally adjusted negative 8% (more owners expect that it will be “harder” to arrange financing than easier), 2 points worse than in March.

Here’s an excerpt from one recent article titled, Main Streets May Soon Be Without a Bank

Government regulations have also forced many small community banks to close over the last three years. The Dodd-Frank Act was designed to regulate the banking and lending industries and decrease the likelihood of another financial catastrophe. Unfortunately, an unintended consequence is soaring costs for community banks struggling to comply with the new regulations. Many of those banks are located in smaller communities. The FDIC released a report last month that stated that no new community bank charters have been granted since 2011 due, in part, to Dodd-Frank.

According to an article, The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: The Triumph of Crony Capitalism (Part 1) written by Jeff Harding, on August 11th, 2010 there are two questions you should consider while evaluating the Act’s impact and scope that help explain this boom-bust cycle:

  1. Why did the housing market become a bubble?
  2. Why would any lender lend money to a home buyer who (i) had a credit score of 500, (ii) made a down payment of 5% or less, and (iii) didn’t have to prove his or her ability to repay?

He answers these questions by saying:

  1. Only cheap money drives bubbles and there is only one entity that creates cheap money and that is the Federal Reserve—from 2000 to 2004 the Fed Funds rate went from 6.5% to 1.0% wildly distorting entrepreneurial behavior. This was the cause of this boom-bust cycle.
  2. No one would lend so carelessly unless they didn’t care. They didn’t care because someone else, in this case the government (Fannie, Freddie, and the FHA), would guarantee repayment.

Everything stems from these two factors yet there is nothing in the Act that prevents the Fed from starting a new cycle or that prevents Fannie or Freddie from again distorting the economics of the housing market.

Couple these alarming events with the fact there are 8.5M unbanked people eligible for Obamacare who will not be able to get it without a bank account…well we all know what rolls down hill.

Small Businesses – Over Regulated? Thousands of Community Banks a.k.a Small Businesses May Disappear!

In 2012, 6,037 new regulations posted in the last 90 days

Our small business, with under 50 employees, does business with community financial institutions (FIs).  We are subjected to many of the regulations FIs are subjected to including:

Sarbanes–Oxley Act

Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Credit CARD Act of 2009

…to name a few.  This equates to many thousands of dollars in added security measures and personnel costs.

We now face another huge challenge, none more onerous than the PPACA (a.k.a. Obamacare) as it ramps up.

Many community banks and credit unions are small businesses too and are subject to the same laws and regulations facing big banks.  The Feds have closed down 10 of our FI customers, costing them their jobs and costing us hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost revenues.  Speaking to many of our contacts at these FIs, most closing could have been avoided.

According to several of these sources, the Feds come in at the end of business day, Friday and take over the bank.  One source, described it similar to be treated as a criminal as she was forced to stand outside her cubicle while they accessed her PC.  She was kept there until after midnight.

Recently, an expert on financial services stated “there will be no de novo (startups) financial institutions due to the steep financial requirement and regulations.”

A quote recent article from CNN Money’s Fortune Magazine, Thousands of banks may disappear, “Now that President Obama has been re-elected, analysts, consultants and deal makers have turned from whether Dodd-Frank will be repealed to what it means for banks now that it’s likely here to stay. The overwhelming conclusion: Thousands of small banks will soon disappear.”

As the number of community banks and credit unions shrink we are forced to seek new markets.  An added burden to  already burdensome economic conditions.  While the Obama administration panders  to big business, big union and advocates big government, small businesses continue to bear the brunt of over regulation.

This is the official government “fair warning” website regulations.gov.  Be afraid!  Be very afraid!

All Obama Can Do Is Ask Us to Look in the Rear View Mirror

Cadillac One -We Can’t Afford! to Go Forward!

Obama has been in the driver seat for four years with a majority in Congress for two years prior to his election and two years after his election, four more years than many presidents and the Democrats held the majority in the Senate for six years.  And yet his campaign is all about telling us to look in the rear view mirror, a.k.a. “it’s Bush’s fault.”  Since January 2007 and for four years, the Democrats were driving the bus.  We get Obamacare and 6 trillion in debt.

If you like this president and you believe in this president, just read Chapter Five of the book, Throw Them All Out.  If you still vote for this president, that’s on you.

Obama’s campaign slogan is “Forward.”  Frankly we can’t “afford to go forward, four more years with this president.  Obamacare alone will sink many small businesses and put us deeper and deeper into debt.  We have already spent more resources, more time, more energy, millions upon millions of dollars in personnel, administration and legal fees to shape this law.  If Sarah Palin had one amazing quality it was to tell it like it is, and Obamacare as it pertains to a solution to our healthcare’s rising costs, is like “putting lipstick on a pig.”

Highly regulated, healthcare is not free market capitalism and competition has been stifled.  Big insurance companies thrive on a highly regulated government subsidized system.  They want it.  They own the politicians.  The lawyers on both sides can pretend to fight for their constituent’s, then club it after work.

Obamacare is a politicians dream and a lawyer’s wet dream.

Now Obama’s campaign is about raising taxes on the high income earners.  That’s all well and good.  What he doesn’t understand is small business owners pay their taxes as ordinary income.  This is a legal structure setup to help small businesses to compete with large corporations.  Small businesses don’t need to pay more taxes.  The higher our personal tax rate becomes, the less we can invest in our small business. Raising taxes on ordinary income is raising taxes on small businesses. Lower the corporate tax rates for all businesses and more small businesses will follow.

High income earners are willing to pay more if big government spends less.  If big government didn’t pick favorites and simply lowered taxes on all businesses, we would have a chance to prosper.  Reign in regulation, stop subsidizing green energy companies and stop playing to the unions, a.k.a. Government Motors (GM), GE and Chrysler.  Stop subsidizing the oil business, but to be fair, stop subsidizing all big businesses.  Leave it to the states, counties and local governments to compete for and attract business.  Businesses will do better to choose a location and flourish where it is best for them, their employees and the community.

Bottom line, less big government, to the tune of $16 trillion in less than four years, less big union, like the takeover of GM, less big business influence, like the stimulus dollars paid to failed green energy companies, including Ted Turner and GE and less unemployment and welfare to us, as individuals, will follow.

Like Alan Kay says. “The best way to predict the future, is to invent it.”  Big government, get out of the way, let us reinvent ourselves.  We have the uncanny ability to prosper through free market competition.  That’s what’s best for our future.

Footnote:  Many conservatives may wonder why Governor Christie is pandering for Obama five days from the election.  Many say it is because he wants what’s best for the State of New Jersey.  I cry “Bullshit!” Obama came out and said he was going to do what’s best for all victims of this hurricane and I believe him, not because he cares, but for political expediency and his failed policies that left 4 American’s dead in Benghazi.  Christie is embracing Obama after this storm because he knows the door is wide open for him as the presidential candidate in 2016, if Romney is defeated and Obama is re-elected for another term.  Christie better hope the door is wide open, because what he had better understand. That at 69 years old, Romney will still be in better shape than Christie to win the next election.

Added Regulatory Burden is a Tax on Community Banks, Credit Unions and Small Business

This is the message from Financial Institutions (FIs) and Small Businesses burdened with Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank and Obamacare.

<—-

Although the Sarbanes Oxley has been in effect since 1992, bank regulators have turned up the heat on FIs and small businesses that support them in recent years.  Regulators have tasked FIs with obtaining extensive background on their 3rd party vendors, not the least of which is a Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 70 Type I or Type II.  Type II is much more comprehensive and is required if a 3rd party vendor has access to sensitive FI data.  Many small businesses have to deal with PCI compliance and regulatory uncertainties placed upon them by Dodd-Frank and Obamacare, as well.

The “short link” to this narrative is  community banks, credit unions and small businesses have to dedicate at least one full-time employees (FTE), plus high level management’s time to manage these regulatory requirements. 

FI’s are comprised mainly of community banks and credit unions with assets of 50 million to 10 Billion.  Many of them are small businesses too, employing 25-50 employees on the lower end to hundreds on the higher end.  Therefore FIs employ FTEs and/or outside consultants to manage the burden.  The SAS 70 requires a great deal of technical expertise.  In addition small businesses have had to hire their own 3rd party accounting, legal, security and compliance experts to test regs tied to intrusion detection, audited financial statements and site inspections.  Vendors have had to install and keep up-to-date hardware, including an array of security cameras and a “boat load” of security and encryption hardware and software, as well.

Consider these FIs manage 20-30 3rd party vendors .  Add to this the cost to each vendor, small community banks and credit unions, who have to manage the same regs.  Consider the changes vendors have needed to make to the software they provide to FIs.  The costs could be well into the billions. 

Add to this hundreds of businesses, call it a “cottage” industry, that have sprung up to aid  3rd party vendors and FIs who can’t afford to deal with all these new government regs and compliance.  Small business vendors can easily spend $10,000 or more per month to provide compliance to customers and the security they need under ever increasing government regulations.  Ironic isn’t it?  New businesses are spawned by increases in government regualtions.

Added regulatory burden is a tax on small business.  Businesses, especially small businesses have to pass that cost to our customers and so on to the end result, the consumer.

One final consideration.  Community banks, credit unions and small businesses are not going to get the media attention of Occupy Wall Street.  We are occupied with raising our families, growing our businesses and gainfully employing people who want to work for a living.  We generate over 60% of the new jobs in this country.  If our government continues to go down the path of increased regulatory burden and continues to place the burden on small business, legislators will have fewer laws to pass, fewer regulations to enforce and fewer job creators to tax.  You will put us and more of my fellow job creators out of work.

Here’s our  message to our representatives in government…

“If you continue to put small businesses,  the real job creators out of business, we will turn the full force of our entrepreneurial spirit into making those of you, who over-burden us with excessive regulatory burden, out of business, too!”

Background:  SAS 70 was issued in 1992 and there have been no changes in it until now. Now effective for accounting periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011 a new standard, Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) 16 will be in effect. Do not expect any immediate changes. Most companies have fiscal years that correspond to the calendar year. For those the new standard will not be effective until January 1, 2012 and the reporting under the new standard will not be available until the company’s financial results for 2012 are published in 2013. Many people misinterpreted the SAS 70 report as a means to obtain assurance regarding a vendor’s controls over compliance and operations. It was not. It was only a report of the vendor’s controls over financial reporting matters. The new SSAE16 reports will be much more comprehensive.

Under the new reporting regime there will be three varieties of reports, SOC 1, 2 and 3. The SOC 1 report will be similar to the existing SAS 70 report in that it will report on the company’s controls relative to its financial reporting. A SOC 2 report may address one or more of the following five key system attributes:

* Security – The system is protected against unauthorized access (both physical and logical).

* Availability – The system is available for operation and use as committed or agreed.

* Processing integrity – System processing is complete, accurate, timely and authorized.

* Confidentiality – Information designated as confidential is protected as committed or agreed.

* Privacy- Personal information is collected, used, retained disclosed and disposed of in conformity with the commitments in the entity’s privacy notice, and with criteria set forth in Generally Accepted Privacy Principles (GAPP) issued by the AICPA.

The new auditing framework places additional demands on the management of the organization being audited. Management must make a representation of the controls in place and a criteria for the description of the system, design and operating effectiveness of the controls. It must also evaluate the risks that threaten the achievement of the control objectives and any changes that were made in the system during the period.

 

A Suggestion On How The Government Could Help The Housing Industry

The housing glut has the entire economy in handcuffs!

Here’s a great approach to get the folks who “deserve” the American Dream a chance!  This proposal from Blair Rugh at Trinovus is a government stimulus plan that will work! 

A Suggestion On How The Government Could Help The Housing Industry

by Blair Rugh

I have a suggestion on how government could help the housing industry. I am reasonably confident that neither President Obama, his economic advisors nor members of Congress read this weekly newsletter. But when you write something that has a reasonable circulation you never know where it will wind up, so here goes.

Three facts we know for sure. (1) The U.S. housing market is in the dumper. Some areas are worse than others, but no area has been unaffected. (2) The volume of foreclosures has harmed low- and middle-income borrowers, particularly African- Americans and Hispanics disproportionately. Many of the people foreclosed upon had no significant asset other than their home. (3) The provisions of the Dodd Frank Act relative to underwriting requirements and loans that can be sold in the secondary market, market conditions and enhanced regulator scrutiny and criticism of all lending will make it much more difficult for future borrowers to get a loan. For good, bad or indifferent the actions of the government and the regulators make it significantly more difficult for the housing industry to recover. Until it does, it will be difficult for the economy to recover.

There are a lot of qualified people who still have a job and can afford a reasonable payment on a home but cannot or will not be able to purchase one because they do not have the down payment. In today’s world, for a working class family, it is virtually impossible to save enough for a reasonable down payment. The husband and/or the wife may both have stable jobs and a stable income but saving the $20,000 or $30,000 required to make a down payment that will qualify them for a loan that they can afford is almost out of sight. Today’s housing prices are as low as they have been in the last 10 or 15 years. If we can just get qualified people into the system, it would be a great advantage for them and if we can deplete the nation’s housing inventory at the same time it would be a great boon to an economic recovery.

Let’s lend qualified borrowers a reasonable down payment on a home purchase, say a maximum of $20,000. Were it mine to do, I would make it available only to persons who do not presently own a home. The goal is to deplete the existing housing inventory, which is not accomplished if someone who owns a home is just moving up. Second, I would limit it to homes that were built before a specified date, say June of this year. The purpose of my plan is not to spur new construction directly. That will happen if the existing inventory of vacant housing is depleted. I would not have the federal government do it directly as I am not sure at this point if the federal government can do anything efficiently. I would have the federal government provide block grants to the various states depending on each state’s inventory of vacant homes.

I would grant the homebuyer a loan that would be secured by a junior mortgage on the home. The mortgage would not bear interest in the initial years and then after a reasonable period of time would require interest at some reduced rate. The loan would be payable upon the sale or transfer of the property or at some reasonable time in the future, say 10 years after it was granted. That should provide the homebuyer sufficient time for the housing market to recover its value and to reduce the first mortgage so that refinancing is achievable.

If 100,000 people qualified for the program, the government outlay at the maximum amount of $20,000 per loan would be $2 billion. While that is a lot of money to anyone I know, the federal government seems to treat it as you and I treat pocket change. And more to the point, it is not an expense of that amount as if properly handled the bulk of the money will be eventually repaid. What I suggest has to be refined and better thought out, but I think it is a viable solution to the housing mess. Moreover, it will put qualified people into housing that they can afford. I am generally pretty conservative and against any government assistance programs. I don’t like social security, Medicare, food stamps or anything similar to those programs. I think government should provide everyone an equal opportunity and then let the chips fall where they may. In this instance, however, the government created the problem so I think it takes a government program to hasten the recovery. The purpose of the program is not to provide relief to anyone but to rescue the housing industry. If it has a collateral result of helping people that is even better. I know you can improve on what I suggest. Add your improvements, and if you think it is a good idea make your representative or senator aware of it.

Hospitals Are For Sick People!

We are a small business in the “high tech” business.  Our goal is “advancing the paperless office.” It’s a shame our company and so many companies like ours simply cannot afford to do business with the government.

Doing business with the government is  a paperwork and regulatory nightmare.  We don’t have the time, the resources, a team of consultants to guide us or a team of  lawyers to protect us, God forbid we forgot to dot an “i” or cross a “t”.

“That is why The Affordable Care Act is destined to fail. It’s unintelligible.  Just ask anyone who hasn’t read it.”

As a software development company which replaces paper with electronic records, we believe technology can and will solve many of the cost containment problems with healthcare.

The problem is government needs to get out of the way.  Forget about subsidizing doctors with taxpayer dollars for buying government mandated and precertified technology called HITECH.  The problem is there’s too great a cost and too much red tape for a small business to get into the game.

Worse, doctors are going to pay too much money from the select few companies that are willing to run the government gauntlet to become certified under Obamacare.

Let the free market work.  My company has 32 employees.  Healthcare costs are a growing concern for our small business.  We pay the employee’s healthcare in full which has risen on the average more than 10% per year per employee over the past several years.  In the process we are seeing benefits shrink and costs increase for both employer and employee.

This is a partnership between employer and employee.  Employers want to provide a benefit in the form of compensation, in particular with a pre-tax benefit to the employee.  Employees want quality affordable healthcare for their families.  We ask the employees to participate in the decision making process.  We collaborate to find the best available plan for the money.

One of my employees with a spouse and 5 kids says, “I might as well just hand my paycheck back over to you to pay for my family’s healthcare.”

As an employer I feel terrible about this type of sentiment, but I’m paying for the employee’s healthcare, plus the cost to shop and administer the plan.  There’s nothing in it for me but to try to remain competitive in the salary and benefits area with other employers.

The 2011 National Physicians Survey, conducted by Thomson Reuters/HCPlexus and polling almost 3,000 American doctors, shows that while Obamacare would raise spending, premiums, overall U.S. health costs, and debt, it wouldn’t raise the quality of American health care. Rather, by a margin of well over 3 to 1, doctors expect the quality of American health care to decline over the next five years, in the wake of Obamacare’s passage: Only 18 percent of doctors expect the quality of health care to “improve,” while a whopping 65 percent expect it to “deteriorate.”

Recall that Gallup recently announced that only 13 percent of Americans support ObamaCare as is.  I’m not blaming this all on the President, but you have to walk the walk to talk the talk.  The President doesn’t do either.

Health insurance cost is a moving target for small business. In 2010 we paid full medical benefits for 27 FTEs.   Our cost averaged $4,900 per employee per year. This is up only 5% over 2009 due to changing providers from Blue Cross to Humana, changing plans from a PPO to an HMO, higher deductibles and over 1/2 of the FTEs selecting H.S.A.s due to the cost to their families. Since there is really no competition between providers, Blue Cross, Humana and United Healthcare we have been switching from one to the next every 2-3 years based on the plans available and the economics. In 2011 the cost will has increased to $5,030 per employee until August when we will again negotiate a new and undoubtedly less desirable coverage. Keep in mind the impact is felt not only by the employer, but by the employee with spouse and children as well.

The answer to rising prices and declining benefits is to increase competition in the health insurance market.  Why do we need a new law to create healthcare exchanges?  Why can’t we lift existing regulations to allow competition across state lines?  Encourage, not put limits on Health Savings Accounts H.S.A.’s as the new Affordable Care Act does.  I pay for my employee’s health and dental benefits up to the monthly H.S.A premium. If they select a more expensive plan they pay the difference.  I have physicians who have discounted procedures 25% because they know I’m paying for their services out of my own pocket (at least until I reach the out of pocket maximum).  The emphasis at our company is to be healthy.  We have our own gym.  We have a cycling team for the formed to fight MS.  If an individual is making decisions on their own behalf with regard to their health and their health care costs, the cost of healthcare will  truly become more affordable.

The bottom line is we simply cannot afford to get sick.

Where common sense fails. disingenuous, dishonest, demagoguery prevails.

From PoliticalCalculations.com: Combined, the Top Ten recipients of this corporate welfare took 45.6% of the total $1,789,449,634 taxpayer dollars that were doled out, with the United Auto Workers taking the largest chunk by a wide margin, with $206,798,086, or 11.6% of all the taxpayer money that was allocated for the purpose.

Surprisingly, two telecommunication giants AT&T and Verizon took the second and third positions, with 7.8% and 5.1% of the total take respectively.

After that, three state agencies occupied the fourth, fifth and sixth largest positions—the Teacher Retirement System of Texas, the Georgia Department of Community Health and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the latter frequently in the news recently for corruption scandals and its massively underfunded pension liabilities.

The eighth and ninth ranks are taken up by the State of New York and the Pension Accounting Services Department within the State of New Jersey’s Treasury Department.  Corporate basket case General Electric, which has come to rely greatly upon government mandates, special protections, subsidies and bailouts for its revenue, rounds out the Top Ten with an even 2.0% of the total handout.

The remaining 1,305 entities collected the remaining 54.4% of the money paid out by the government to pay for the health benefits of people who chose to retire from their professions early, with the Minnesota Cement Masons taking the least of all the recipients, at 60 dollars.  Source: politicalcalcualtions.com


Why do politicians, the president the mainstream media and a plethora of celebs continue to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear?  Not so at the Washington Times…

“The president’s own secretary of health and human services, Kathleen Sebelius, has admitted a major section of the Obamacare law is “totally unsustainable.”

“The now-familiar monthly trickling down of new waivers is, at best, a tacit admission that Obamacare is a failure. So far, seven entire states and 1,372 businesses, unions and other institutions have received waivers from the law. The list includes the administration’s friends and allies and, of course, those who have the best lobbyists.”

“More than 50 percent of the Obamacare waiver beneficiaries are union members, which is striking because union members
account for less than 12 percent of the American work force.”

“But the political payoffs don’t stop there. The Obama administration  didn’t forget its closest friends in the latest round of waivers. Although  there are 435 congressional districts across America, nearly 20 percent of the new waivers, amazingly, found their way to a single district – Mrs. Pelosi‘s.   As for Mr. Reid,  well, the entire state of Nevada found an early waiver in its Christmas stocking.”

The answer is they have no real stake in the game.  Politicians and the President want to be re-elected.  Their own constituents get a pass.  They don’t pay for their own healthcare. The mainstream media and celebrities and their Cadillac health insurance plans can afford to pay more.

The small businesses and their employees are left to deal with big government mandates already proven to unpalatable to 3.1 million individuals exempted from the plan, of which 1.55 million are in union plans. Those who received waivers and those who pay no taxes are going to continue to vote in favor Obama, Pelosi and Reid.  They have held the keys to the kingdom and skyrocketing debt too long.

If you are a taxpayer, do something.  Lean hard on federal, state and local politicians to come up with a better answer to the high cost of healthcare than the Affordable Care Act.

Ask your physician to cut you a break on your healthcare costs.  Negotiate with every insurer who offers healthcare in your state.  Look for plans which cover individuals and their families outside your employer’s plan(s).  Start moving.

Do everything you can to stay healthy.  Hospitals are for sick people.

Note:  Please help us get the good word out.  Share us on your favorite social media site and Stumble Upon.  Thanks.

%d bloggers like this: